Thursday, March 24, 2005

Why the press refuses to report all the super-duper happy news from Iraq

A really excellent article from a guy who is a fairly consistent hawk on Iraq:
Simply put, U.S. officials in Baghdad have in the past tended not to tell the whole truth. It is of course in their interest to convey good news. They've performed their job so well, however, that no one believes them anymore. The public's exposure to this has mostly been confined to shifting reports about the numbers of Iraqi forces and other upbeat but hollow assessments put out by U.S. officials. Embassy and military officials in Iraq have told me and others, with a straight face, that the airport road is the safest road in Iraq, that Iyad Allawi will win the election by a landslide, that U.S. forces have killed more insurgents than the same officials have said even exist, and other tales too numerous to list. Dedication to the mission, career advancement, an impulse to spin--whatever the motive, the public face of the U.S. mission in Iraq has been so disconnected from reality for so long that were its assessments eventually to jibe with the whole truth, it would have no more persuasive power than the boy who cried wolf. For if the Baghdad press corps has a bias, it is a bias against bullshit.

Read it all. His conclusion? Things are going better but, of course, no one wants to be William "Light at the End of the Tunnel" Westmoreland.

Permalink posted by Jonathan : 11:38 AM

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?