Blogoland

The most hilarious explanation yet:

...[T]he war critics cannot even agree on a united position. It's either withdraw quickly, withdraw gradually, increase troop levels, other forms of redeployment, I've heard that word bandied about, and when they say they were lied to about prewar intelligence they come off as petulant, whining, incompetent boobs calling intoquestion their own political legitimacy. If they can be lied to this easily, what good are they having even more power? If Bush can lie to them, what could Dominique de Villepin do with them? So they make themselves out to be a bunch of boobs in the process of portraying Bush as a real danger.

Yeah, that sounds about right. For a lunatic.